A student’s Real School Of Montessori journey and stages through inquiry, discovery and innovation were analyzed and described in our students learning journey post. Through these various stages of learning students explore various concepts. The essence of these projects is that these concepts are not just limited to Physics Arts or Math.
Learning courses for your kids! Get free trial here
Multidisciplinary education is a separate educational strategy that allows pupils to learn and explore different courses or curricula from different fields. Education is not restricted to a single field of study. A student of engineering, for example, can take a humanities course.
A multidisciplinary approach to curricular integration emphasizes the various views that different disciplines might contribute to a theme, subject, or issue. Multiple disciplines are combined to study the same subject in a multidisciplinary program.
When we talk about a hierarchical educational system, the idea of “learning” is restricted by a number of factors, including curriculum, teaching-learning approaches, time constraints, and so on. In a pinch, the educational vision is jeopardized.
One of the advantages of a multidisciplinary educational approach is that you gain a more comprehensive grasp of the world. A multidisciplinary approach combines aspects of each department into the study plans of the other, rather than focusing on individual divisions and their subject topics individually.
Have you ever been working on a problem by yourself and come up against a spot that completely stumps you? You gaze at it for hours, but for the life of you, you can’t quite figure it out. Then one day, a buddy comes by and takes up that crucial piece and sets it exactly where it belongs. Oh, the allure of varied viewpoints!
That’s what a diverse approach looks like. It offers up possibilities for new ideas and ways of thinking.
Your kids will be able to appreciate the power of fresh ideas thanks to multidisciplinary education.
It assists students in developing a pragmatic approach by allowing them to choose which subjects they will study and what rewards they may receive. They have more time to weigh the risks and benefits before making a decision. As a result, a multidisciplinary curriculum adds pragmatism and flexibility to the equation.
It allows your students to use their minds and edTech devices to sculpt their own path rather than following the path set out by the educational system.
Multidisciplinary learning isn’t simply a theory of education; it’s a practical manner of seeing the world. Why should school be any different? When you graduate, you’ll be interacting with individuals from all walks of life, so why should school be any different? It will be easier for you to perform in the working world if you can compile and collaborate with individuals from many walks of life.
Hopefully, whichever educational path you choose stresses the value of teamwork. One of the most essential benefits of a multidisciplinary curriculum, however, is the concept of working together to produce a greater whole.
Multidisciplinary learning necessitates the ability to interact successfully with persons from many fields. You share the same terminology, share their beliefs, and comprehend what drives them. These abilities will aid you in making connections, solving complex issues, and collaborating effectively with your peers.
When Kejal was studying boiling points of various liquids while researching about what can prevent milk from boiling over, she will also come across other subjects such as Physics. For instance how water in the milk can be boiled in vacuum pressure that will prevent milk from scalding.
When the student integrates principles and concepts from various subjects it helps them combine and connect what she/ he learns rather than compartmentalize knowledge.
Learning courses for your kids! Get free trial here
With this multidisciplinary and comprehensive approach students are breaking a critical barrier to learning – relevance and context.
Questions such as “ What am I going to use this for” or “what’s in it for me” is answered because when students dig deeper, dabble and experiment with various concepts they learn how seemingly unrelated content and theory fit together into the bigger scheme of things.
There is yet another breakthrough with this approach. Those who experience this process of learning will gain a strong and deeper understanding of the subject. When that happens, a student has a clear vision of what he likes, where his aptitude lies and what he wants to pursue.
This is completely missing in a subject-based curriculum approach. And why is that the case? It is because when a student learns subjects in isolation, he does not get the kind of exposure to knowledge that is needed for him to take a clear call on whether this subject works for him or not?
There was a student who was intrigued by media and journalism. When she wanted to pursue a career in Journalism, she realized that she needed a sound understanding of math and statistics. And it does not just end in calculating percentages, she also had to interpret and analyze data.
Who would think that math and mass communication had such a connection? Pick any profession and you will need to use a multitude of skills, An attorney may not only need to master several laws and civic procedures but he also has to have a deep knowledge of behavioural economics.
A pilot needs to have geography and meteorological knowledge. Real jobs require professionals to have knowledge of more than one subject. Then isn’t it logical that when learning the basics of any subjects, the right way to do so is by connecting the concepts from various subjects? And if that is done, a student will truly know where his interests lie and not just blindly go the Engineer or the medical route.
Students with the Subject-based curriculum are ushered to finish chapters despite having an insufficient or limited understanding of the content. The questions at the end of the chapter or a quarterly or final do not give a true reflection of the child’s understanding.
There are serious gaps in their ability which is left unnoticed and the child moves from one class to the other until a time comes when these gaps are difficult to bridge.
Then there is this other side of the bell curve who are exceptional performers who are denied the opportunity to explore beyond the standardized curriculum. A teaching approach that is inclusive of all subjects and crosses the boundaries of curriculum and discipline is ideal for both these groups.
A student cannot make progress unless s/he has a good grasp of the concepts. This understanding is not defined by grades or marks. In this student-centred approach, the student decides how much to learn and what pace.
The facilitator adopts an inquiry-based learning approach where the student learns by way of asking questions. You see, the end of the chapter questions does not actually come at the end of Chapter 1 of a biology book or Chapter 10 of a Math book. Asking questions is an important factor of learning and has a pivotal role in expanding the learning and understanding for the child.
Also Read : Are We Setting Up Students for Failure? Is Rote Learning Really Required?
Physics and mathematics are deeply interwoven, yet are entirely two separate ideological entities. Similarly, biology works only because of Chemistry and vice versa. Because everything is deeply interlinked yet stand in isolation.
There is a lot of confusion when concepts and theories from these subjects are used hand in hand. And that is one of the main reasons that schools have separate curriculums for each of the subject. A child can get into a cycle of the unending loop of questions and answers all linked to each other in a wider perspective.
One of the philosophies behind the Problem Based curriculum is that Ambiguity and “Productive” confusion can lead to a more varied understanding of concepts.
Arthur Graesser and Sidney D’Mello professors of psychology conducted an experiment with under-graduation students. The students were shown 2 animated bots. Each student was asked to assess and study the scientific merits while engaging in conversation with the bots.
The Professors then tried to “induce confusion” by programming the bots to contradict each other and call on the student to intervene.
The students who got the confusing messages showed “significantly higher learning gains” than those who had discussed the problems with more agreeable bots.
According to Professor Duo, confusion is critical to learning. Because a student to clear the confusion inevitably puts effort in working through multiple solutions, thus enhancing his knowledge and high order thinking abilities.
With the multidisciplinary approach we are not trying to induce confusion purposefully, but letting students struggle with confusion in a natural manner as they understand, try and test various concepts in real-life scenarios. Confronting and embracing confusion is a critical skill to shape them into effective learners.
Also Read : Students Learning Journey with Real School Of Montessori: How Effective is It?
In the article -"What are the Advantages of Online Teaching at The Real School?" we…
The term "school" carries profound significance in the realm of education, representing more than just…
Mathematics, often referred to as "Math," is a subject that elicits various reactions from students…
Homework, an integral part of the academic journey, often raises questions about its purpose and…
In the intricate tapestry of education, teachers stand as the pillars shaping the intellectual and…
The concept of real education is evolving, transcending traditional views that equate it solely with…
View Comments
very interesting and enlightening. Thank you so much for this blog.